I’ve just finished watching a TV program on station Nederland Twee (Netherlands Two), about the assisted suicide of Craig Ewert, a 59 year old university professor who was a sufferer of ALS. The show was a poignant journalistic peice following the last period of time of his life, and finished with his death. The story was told in a very sensitive and low key manner, devoid of any form of sensationalism or dramatisation that is the staple of our mainstream news diet. Indeed, I found it to be a moving tribute to an intelligent man who wanted to choose for himself the manner of his own passing, rather than let nature run its course and reduce him to not much more than – in his words – a living tomb. At the end I found myself in tears, as I was very emotionally involved with his life and his death, and was thankful to him for letting me explore in a meaningful way just what death means to me as an individual. I think that’s really only how death can be explored, as an individual, because death is something deeply personal for all of us.
As I was reading some of the comments on the news articles concerning the show, I become angered at the petulant statements made by some people in the right to life, or ‘Care Not Killing’ camp, who apparently were angered by the show being televised at all. With one comment made, that this could actually give people ideas! To which I say, I hope it does!
I try not to go down the path of very politically sensitive discussions on my blog because I don’t want my blog to be a political discussion board, but I’m going to break my own guidelines on this issue and speak my peice. So here’s the fair warning label. If anyone has strong views on Euthanasia supporting the pro life position, or simply cannot take part in a discussion of this nature, leave now. From here on in, I’m going to discuss why I believe they are wrong, and the individual right to choice is morally right. Anyone who feels even slightly mentally challenged on this issue should seriously back out now.
It is in fact an appalling state of affairs when one individual can pass judgement and determine for another terminally sick individual the manner in which they will die. It is quite simply, wrong! Any society that proclaims to be civilised will have built into it a legal framework for allowing an individual to choose an assisted death to preserve dignity and end suffering when a natural death will do neither. The fact that there are individuals who have the audacity to proclaim that this is wrong, are in fact contributing to the suffering of those whose wish to opt for euthanasia. How dare they! The most basic of all human rights, is the right to live and the right to choice. As a person of sound mind and body, noone has the right to tell me how I should live. As long as I live my life within the bounds of the law of the society I choose to live in, I should be free to live to do as I want without interference from another. Similarly I should be allowed to choose the manner of my passing. There is no moral or legal argument that can be made that is sufficient to take that choice away from me. And should anyone dare to impose on me that it is “Gods law” that implicitly denies me my right to choose my end, then I would say it is a choice taken away from me by ignorant savages incapable of intelligent thought. Hence by the very extreme extent of their stupidity they should not be allowed to make decisions at all, let alone one that affects me in such a profound way.
So this is my stance on the issue itself. I make no apologies for the strong manner in which I present it, as it is a deeply philosophical topic that doesn’t deserve anything less than a strong opinion.
Concerning the show itself there were a lot of claims that this was a media stunt designed to promote the channel, and pull in ratings. Having seen the show, I completely disagree with this opinion. In an age of spoonfed sensationalistic drama TV, this program was quiet, sensitive and thoughtful. Most importantly it was made at the request of Craig and his wife. This was absolutely the opposite of Big Brother, which is the very definition of a media stunt that uses sensationalism to create a vortex of drama designed to capture audiences and ratings. Craig’s ending was emotional, but for those who chose to watch it, it made you reflect on your own life and consider what it is that ‘a good life’ means.
Perhaps the best summation of my feelings I found was from an article in the UK’s, The Guardian newspaper
Watching a man drink liquid through a pink straw, ask for apple juice and music, then close his eyes and lie back on his pillows is intense, moving and tragic. It should make us think and talk about death, as we did when we were children and asked our parents if we would ever die. Too many grown ups push away that question forever – dispensing with the memento mori, the reminder of mortality, that has been part of human culture for thousands of years.
As I finish this peice, it’s late, with the clock striking into the wee hours of the morning, and I feel a sense of happiness at the thought that I will wake up tomorrow with my good health and a new day of possibilities before me. I’ll cherish for a while that I still have time to live and chase dreams and I’ll hopefully appreciate for a little while longer that life is a gift and should not be wasted or taken for granted. For it doesn’t last forever and we all have to come to terms with, and face, our own ultimate end.
When I do, I hope do so with the same courage, dignity and calm that Craig Ewert did. Peace be with him.
Andy.
Recent Comments